In the last few years, frameworks like Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright have become indispensable for test automation. Each has its strengths and audience, which naturally led many companies to use multiple tools at the same time. At first, this diversity seems strategic. Over time, though, it creates a side effect: scattered tests, fragmented reports, and management challenges.
According to the State of Testing 2024 survey, more than 60% of organizations already use two or more automation frameworks simultaneously. The challenge goes beyond choosing the right tool, it’s also about the lack of integration between them.
The problem with non-integrated tests
When each team adopts its own framework, communication breaks down. Reports are generated in different formats, with no standardization, and they don’t always reach leadership in a clear way. On top of that, variables, flows, and scripts are recreated over and over again, wasting effort that could be reused.
Another issue is management. Results often remain locked in a purely technical view. This prevents executives and managers from understanding the real business impact of quality, which compromises strategic decisions.
The side effect for companies
This fragmented scenario generates three direct consequences:
- More time spent identifying real problems: teams need to cross-check reports and logs before taking action.
- Difficulty comparing projects and updated versions: without a unified standard, measuring performance is almost impossible.
- Risk of internal flaws: QA, development, and management stop sharing the same vision.
According to The Forrester Wave: Continuous Automation Testing Platforms (2023), companies that centralize their testing strategy reduce defect resolution time by up to 30%, precisely because they eliminate these bottlenecks.
Why centralization is the next step in software development?
Having multiple frameworks doesn’t have to be a problem. What’s missing is a centralizing layer that unifies the interpretation of all results. This approach allows each team to keep using the tool they prefer, while still ensuring consistent reports, integrated dashboards, and complete visibility of quality.
Centralizing means turning that variety into an advantage. Tests that used to be isolated can now interact, avoiding duplication, complementing each other, and enabling faster, better-informed decisions.
TestBooster.ai: Your Quality Hub
This is where TestBooster.ai comes in. The platform was designed as a quality hub, connecting what your company already has and simplifying what needs to evolve, through AI-powered, natural language-driven testing process.
- Integration with legacy tests: frameworks like Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright keep running, now with unified reports and dashboards.
- Natural language: anyone can describe test scenarios without writing code.
- Holistic view: dashboards translate quality into business impact, not just technical terms.
- Real scalability: hundreds of tests can run in parallel or at strategic times, without slowing down workflows.
Your quality hub in action
Picture a digital bank where part of the team uses Selenium and another uses Cypress. Today, each team generates separate reports, making global analysis harder. With TestBooster, on top of running AI- and natural language-driven tests, both connect in a single hub, with unified reports and real-time execution monitoring. Managers no longer need to interpret separate technical reports, and teams can share information more easily.
Transform your software testing process
Framework diversity can be a sign of technical maturity. Without centralization, though, it turns into an expensive problem. By consolidating scattered tests into a single platform, TestBooster helps companies save time, avoid rework, and make smarter decisions about software quality.
If your organization is already dealing with fragmented tests, it’s time to try TestBooster.ai. More than just a testing platform, it’s your quality hub.
