Testim vs TestBooster
Testim uses click recording to create tests visually. While more accessible than Selenium or Cypress, it still relies on recorded interactions that can break with UI changes. TestBooster goes further: it uses intent-driven AI to create truly resilient tests in natural language.
| Feature | Testim | TestBooster |
|---|---|---|
| Test creation | Click recording | Natural language with AI |
| Creation speed | Moderate | Up to 24x faster |
| Resilience to UI changes | Partial (auto-healing) | |
| Native mobile testing | ||
| Natural language input | ||
| CI/CD integration | ||
| Auto-generated evidence | Basic | Full screenshots + logs |
| Intent-driven AI engine | ||
| Truly codeless | Partial | |
| Portuguese language support |
Our conclusion
Testim is a good introduction to low-code automation, but its recording approach still creates fragile tests. TestBooster uses intent-driven AI — not recording — to create tests that survive layout changes. Combined with native mobile testing support and full Portuguese language support, TestBooster is the superior choice for Brazilian teams.