Mabl vs TestBooster
Mabl is a low-code AI test automation platform that uses a browser extension to record interactions and apply auto-healing to selectors. While easier than traditional frameworks, it still relies on selector-based recording and lacks native mobile testing. TestBooster takes a fundamentally different approach: intent-driven AI that understands what you want to test, not which elements to click.
| Feature | Mabl | TestBooster |
|---|---|---|
| Coding required | Low-code (some scripting) | No code — natural language |
| Test creation speed | Fast (recorder-based) | Up to 24x faster |
| Resilience to UI changes | Auto-healing selectors | Intent-driven — no selectors |
| Native mobile testing | ||
| Natural language input | ||
| CI/CD integration | ||
| Auto-generated evidence | Screenshots + reports | Full screenshots + logs |
| Intent-driven AI engine | ||
| Test maintenance effort | Low-Medium | Minimal |
| Portuguese language support |
Our conclusion
Mabl is a solid low-code option for web-only testing teams, but it falls short on mobile coverage and true codeless accessibility. TestBooster goes further with full web and mobile support, Portuguese language input, and an intent-driven AI that never relies on selectors — making tests inherently more resilient and faster to create.