Not sure which automation tool is right
for your team?
We’ve compared two leading solutions to help you
make the smartest choice: TestBooster.ai and Selenium.
Choosing the wrong tool can lead
to high costs, long learning curve,
and inefficient testing processes.
Don’t leave room for error, testing with intelligence is testing with AI.
TestBooster.ai is an innovative platform that uses Artificial Intelligence to
automate your software testing process. Its AI engine can execute
multiple tests simultaneously and on schedule, boosting your team’s productivity and accelerating deploy.
Compare
Selenium is a browser automation tool built to simulate
user interactions with web applications. It enables developers and QA engineers
to automate repetitive tasks like filling out forms, clicking
buttons, navigating pages, and validating UI elements.
Ready to Test Smarter?
Between the power of AI and the complexity of traditional testing, choosing the right tool is easy. Talk to one of our specialists and lead the transformation
TestBooster.ai uses AI to understand context application, reducing breakages in tested features, especially in case of updates. Selenium, on the other hand, relies on manual selectors (ID, CSS, XPath), requiring constant code adjustments when the page structure changes.
Not at all! TestBooster offers a visual, no-code interface, making it accessible for non-technical users. Selenium requires knowledge of languages like Python, Java, or C#.
TestBooster generates detailed reports with actionable insights and error resolution suggestions, cutting down debugging time. Selenium has no native reporting feature and depends on third-party libraries.
TestBooster is a commercial platform with regular updates and dedicated support, ensuring fast bug fixes and new features. Selenium is community-maintained, which may lead to slower updates and longer wait times for fixes.
TestBooster leverages AI to identify critical tests cases and guarantee their execution, saving time in large test suites. Selenium runs sequentially and lacks smart prioritization, leaving test organization entirely up to the developer.